Research articleOpen access

Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison

BMC Medicine · 16 March 2017

Reference library record. This work was written and published by the people and publisher named here. It is listed in the Sterling IMRES reference library for study and citation. Sterling IMRES did not author or publish it, and listing a work does not mean its authors are affiliated with the institute. Metadata verified via Crossref. How records are verified

Summary

Compares websites and characteristics of potential predatory journals with legitimate open access and subscription biomedical journals. It identifies features such as spelling errors, distorted images and very low article charges that can help authors spot likely predatory journals.

Summary written by Sterling IMRES editors. Read the original abstract at the publisher.

Authors

Cite this work

Shamseer L, Moher D, Maduekwe O, Turner L, Barbour V, Burch R, et al. Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison. BMC Medicine. 2017;15(1):28. doi:10.1186/s12916-017-0785-9

Related publications