Predatory journals: no definition, no defence
Nature · DOI: 10.1038/d41586-019-03759-y
BMC Medicine · 16 March 2017
Compares websites and characteristics of potential predatory journals with legitimate open access and subscription biomedical journals. It identifies features such as spelling errors, distorted images and very low article charges that can help authors spot likely predatory journals.
Summary written by Sterling IMRES editors. Read the original abstract at the publisher.
Shamseer L, Moher D, Maduekwe O, Turner L, Barbour V, Burch R, et al. Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison. BMC Medicine. 2017;15(1):28. doi:10.1186/s12916-017-0785-9
Nature · DOI: 10.1038/d41586-019-03759-y
PeerJ · DOI: 10.7717/peerj.4375