Position paper

Predatory journals: no definition, no defence

Nature · 11 December 2019

Reference library record. This work was written and published by the people and publisher named here. It is listed in the Sterling IMRES reference library for study and citation. Sterling IMRES did not author or publish it, and listing a work does not mean its authors are affiliated with the institute. Metadata verified via Crossref. How records are verified

Summary

Presents a consensus definition of predatory journals and publishers agreed by an international group of researchers, editors and publishers. The definition centres on prioritising self-interest over scholarship and on false or misleading information, giving institutions a shared basis for policy.

Summary written by Sterling IMRES editors. Read the original abstract at the publisher.

Authors

The full author list is available from the publisher.

Cite this work

Grudniewicz A, Moher D, Cobey KD, Bryson GL, Cukier S, Allen K, et al. Predatory journals: no definition, no defence. Nature. 2019;576(7786):210-212. doi:10.1038/d41586-019-03759-y

Related publications