Research articleOpen access

A Randomized Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control

New England Journal of Medicine · 26 November 2015

Reference library record. This work was written and published by the people and publisher named here. It is listed in the Sterling IMRES reference library for study and citation. Sterling IMRES did not author or publish it, and listing a work does not mean its authors are affiliated with the institute. Metadata verified via Crossref. How records are verified

Summary

Presents the main results of the SPRINT trial, which compared a systolic blood-pressure target below 120 mm Hg with a target below 140 mm Hg in adults at increased cardiovascular risk without diabetes. Its findings on cardiovascular events and mortality, weighed against higher rates of some adverse events, informed subsequent hypertension guidelines.

Summary written by Sterling IMRES editors. Read the original abstract at the publisher.

Authors

Group author: The SPRINT Research Group.

Cite this work

The SPRINT Research Group. A Randomized Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control. New England Journal of Medicine. 2015;373(22):2103-2116. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1511939

Related research

PublishedInterventional

Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)

SPRINT was a large US multicentre randomised trial run by the NHLBI that compared two blood pressure targets in adults with hypertension. Participants were assigned either to an intensive systolic target or to the conventional target, and were followed for major cardiovascular events. Its main findings were published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2015.

2010

Related publications