Articles
Original research, educational articles, editorials, position papers and reporting statements.
36 records
Publications
Publications hub
Scholarly outputs other than full-length books, discoverable by type, division, year and access.
54publications
44open access
54with verified DOIs
Reviews
Narrative and clinical reviews that synthesise a field for clinicians, scientists and students.
13 records
Evidence reviews
Systematic reviews, meta-analyses and evidence summaries built on explicit, reproducible methods.
5 records
Reports
Research reports, technical reports and monographs.
0 records
Reference library record. This work was written and published by the people and publisher named here. It is listed in the Sterling IMRES reference library for study and citation. Sterling IMRES did not author or publish it, and listing a work does not mean its authors are affiliated with the institute. Metadata verified via Crossref. How records are verified
Catalogue
All publications
DOI fields are shown only where a real DOI exists, and full texts link to the publisher, which holds distribution rights.
10 publications
CONSORT 2025 statement: updated guideline for reporting randomised trialsOPEN ACCESS
BMJ · DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2024-081123
2025
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviewsOPEN ACCESS
BMJ · DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n71
2021
A Picture Is Worth a Thousand Views: A Triple Crossover Trial of Visual Abstracts to Examine Their Impact on Research DisseminationOPEN ACCESS
Journal of Medical Internet Research · DOI: 10.2196/22327
2020
Predatory journals: no definition, no defence
Nature · DOI: 10.1038/d41586-019-03759-y
2019
The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articlesOPEN ACCESS
PeerJ · DOI: 10.7717/peerj.4375
2018
Visual Abstracts to Disseminate Research on Social Media
Annals of Surgery · DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000002277
2017
A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer reviewOPEN ACCESS
F1000Research · DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.12037.3
2017
Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparisonOPEN ACCESS
BMC Medicine · DOI: 10.1186/s12916-017-0785-9
2017
Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publicationsOPEN ACCESS
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1212247109
2012
Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals
Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · DOI: 10.1177/014107680609900414
2006